Mark@Abbey M/S 235 Report post Posted November 12, 2014 Abbey Motorsport Development car Powered by Sprintex Calibrated by EcuTek Starting to see some better numbers from the Sprintex SC with some development with using EcuTek development software 2 chillismoke and Keethos reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GTB 53 Report post Posted November 12, 2014 Gimme, gimme,gimme..... that`s two teasers from you in 24hrs Mark ! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
smudge 1020 Report post Posted November 12, 2014 I need to revisit you soon Mark, finally putting my HKS air intake on! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Special K 442 Report post Posted November 13, 2014 Mark, what boost are you running your development car at? Spec K Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rob275 1817 Report post Posted November 13, 2014 This will be at 1bar at 7250rpm I believe. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kodename47 446 Report post Posted November 13, 2014 75mm runs at ~9 psi, 70mm runs at ~11 psi so I'd imagine around 11.5 psi on the 69mm. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rob275 1817 Report post Posted November 13, 2014 75mm runs at ~9 psi, 70mm runs at ~11 psi so I'd imagine around 11.5 psi on the 69mm. That low? Why did I have in my head the 75mm ran at 11psi :S Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kodename47 446 Report post Posted November 13, 2014 75mm: 1 rob275 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
smudge 1020 Report post Posted November 13, 2014 I'm at exactly 1bar on the 69mm pulley Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rob275 1817 Report post Posted November 13, 2014 that'd be 14psi .8 kg/cm2 is 11psi Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mark@Abbey M/S 235 Report post Posted November 13, 2014 Sounds even better. Rob can you post the video I put on facebook on here. 1 Special K reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Special K 442 Report post Posted November 13, 2014 Thanks Mark - ( if it 'sounds even better' get back to technicals, please.. (haha)..) For the sake of clarification - 'cos I'm an idiot - can we please quote a 'Bar/psi' comparison? I believed 14psi = 1bar. Is that wrong? (As for quoting kg/cm2...??!!??.... eh?... what anabollock steroid are you overdosing on, Rob..? ) Spec K Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rob275 1817 Report post Posted November 13, 2014 Thanks Mark - ( if it 'sounds even better' get back to technicals, please.. (haha)..) For the sake of clarification - 'cos I'm an idiot - can we please quote a 'Bar/psi' comparison? I believed 14psi = 1bar. Is that wrong? (As for quoting kg/cm2...??!!??.... eh?... what anabollock steroid are you overdosing on, Rob..? ) Spec K The abbey graph is in Kg/cm2, for clarifaction this is basically the same as Bar so the 75mm pulley is running at 0.8 bar, 69 is at true to 1 bar as you will get it. 14psi is indeed 1 bar, or near enough. Can't embed the video but here it is.. https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=898785300146405&set=vb.106834979341445&type=2&theater Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lauren 2259 Report post Posted November 13, 2014 IIRC 14.7psi = 1 Bar Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rob275 1817 Report post Posted November 13, 2014 A little less than that, but in the grand scheme of things it's negligible for a forum Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Special K 442 Report post Posted November 13, 2014 Tnx for the clarification, Rob/Lauren... ... I don't deal with this forrin weights/measures stuff, gimme a pound of bananas for 3shillings and 6pence, ta... Spec K Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rob275 1817 Report post Posted November 14, 2014 Tnx for the clarification, Rob/Lauren... ... I don't deal with this forrin weights/measures stuff, gimme a pound of bananas for 3shillings and 6pence, ta... Spec K That is foreign, get with the times! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Special K 442 Report post Posted November 14, 2014 Get with the times? I'm not a snob - I'll stick with the Telegraph, thanks... Spec K 1 rob275 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mark@Abbey M/S 235 Report post Posted November 18, 2014 Been playing again on the dyno yesterday playing with the calibration , Injector end angle and Pi versus DI ratio. now up to 300 bhp flywheel still think there is more to come with more fine tuning , think we will sort per cylinder AFR measurement out and configure our PLEX knock monitor to give per cylinder knock readings so we can tweak per cylinder fuelling/ignition out. 2 KevinA and Keethos reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Special K 442 Report post Posted November 18, 2014 Been playing again on the dyno yesterday playing with the calibration , Injector end angle and Pi versus DI ratio. now up to 300 bhp flywheel still think there is more to come with more fine tuning , think we will sort per cylinder AFR measurement out and configure our PLEX knock monitor to give per cylinder knock readings so we can tweak per cylinder fuelling/ignition out. Mark, that's gotta be 300+ if you've got 262 at the hubs... and that is an impressive torque curve (but the "ditch glitch" is still there...) What fuel are you running and what boost? Is it worth considering octane booster ? - there's mixed feelings out there. I've looked into it and I'm tempted, for next year, to use 108 octane fuel with customised 'map'. There are significant benefits. But only when I feel it's appropriate, like when I'm late collecting my pension, or the TSS spider lover/ masher from Japan are shafting me on track, (as usual...) ..hrrmph... Spec k Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mark@Abbey M/S 235 Report post Posted November 18, 2014 SpecialK Shell V power fuel. 7 lb/ft dip is that worth worrying about or smoother like a normal dyno; Thanks 3 LFA, Keethos and GTB reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CHOSENMAN007 81 Report post Posted May 9, 2015 Those are very impressive numbers indeed Mark. Id be happy with that. I 100% need HKS headers. I swear im running 14psi on a 75mm pulley. Got to check my data again. But think so. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KevinA 695 Report post Posted May 10, 2015 Looks really good Mark, I'm fast believing SC is the way forward. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mark@Abbey M/S 235 Report post Posted May 10, 2015 For a track biased car I feel the HKS V2 maybe the way forward tbh. 3 Ade, GT86Jay and Lauren reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mark@Abbey M/S 235 Report post Posted May 16, 2015 Started to do some suspension/wheels upgrade Enkei rs05rr 8.5 Frt 9.5 Rr x 18 ET42 , Dunlop RT Maxx 245/40 x 18 ( maybe I should have gone for 235/35 x 18) HKS Hipermax IV GT damper set up (lowered another 10mm from Stock HKS setting dampers set to 15 mid way at the moment) Super Pro rear lower arms and track arms to allow the rear cambers to be set up correctly Already have Super Pro front lower arm bush upgrades fitted All set up on our in house Hunter Hawkeye Alignment rig At the moment suspension settings are; 1.5 neg front camber 1.0 neg rear camber 0.1 degree toe in rear track 0.1 degree toe out front track still running stock roll bars all round. 3 Keethos, Bles and CHOSENMAN007 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
